Most skeptics ask political rants disguised as rhetorical questions, why can't they focus on the science?

I'm afraid it works both ways in here, there are a lot of rhetorical questions by people that believe in AGW disguised as science questions. Rhetorical questions do not belong on YA, as much as we'd like to make a particular point.Most skeptics ask political rants disguised as rhetorical questions, why can't they focus on the science?
The true dynamic of science in the universe, both that which we understand and that which we do not, will continue regardless of our survival rate as a human species. The spin in space is bigger than we are.





The world will NOT end but - we may end as a species and so may thousands (if not millions) of others through our lack of understanding and irresponsibility toward the things we do understand. It's too simple but it's not easy.





I am a confirmed skeptic. I also choose science as my platform rather than political agenda. Fact supercedes opinion as the strongest point of arguement.Most skeptics ask political rants disguised as rhetorical questions, why can't they focus on the science?
They don't care about the science, mainly because they can't understand it.





Many of them, in the USA at least, wouldn't care about AGW if Al Gore hadn't jumped on the bandwagon and over sensationalised it.





But because he did those that opposed his politics now refuse to believe in AGW.





Pretty stupid to let politics blinker your thinking on such a major issue really.
Yahoo is not going to necessarily attract experts in the field of climate science to debate the issue. But there are many climate skeptic blogs that do talk about the science. I suggest you go there if you are interested in a more scientific discussion.
because when one is not a gorean disciple, any reference to actual scientific FACT is 'rebutted' with ';that failed theory was disproved long ago.'; despite the fact being current correct and proved.


AWG zealotry cannot be argued against rationally.
Because the science isn't on their side, and they only reason they've convinced themselves that AGW is wrong is for political reasons.
Because politics (such as Al Gore representing Global Warming) are a good counter attack on believes of climate shift. There will always be debate until the world ends finally.
It is a political movement that has about as much to do with science as late night psychics.