Credible political rants?

Don't ppl know that when they use ';huffington post';, ';wikipedia'; and ';move on'; as a source to back up their ideology, they automatically lose credibility?Credible political rants?
I love how people scoff at Fox as biased hateful right wing rhetoric,





Yet Hillary Clinton's entired campaign has acknowleged that Fox was the only fair news channel to thier campaign during the primary.





And yes they lose credibility with me if they cite Huffington Post or KoS.Credible political rants?
I would trust wikipedia over NBC





AIS: last time I checked Rush has never said he is a news source. He's a political commentator and does not try to hide the fact that he is bias...unlike many in the AP. He gives his opinions and when he does present facts he sources them from credible sources.
Well how about this. Go to any news source, and you can see that Islamic Extremists still want to kill Americans and will do anything to accomplish their goal.


In case you didn't realize it, terrorists are a threat. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,4238鈥?/a>


This happened two hours ago. I hope God has mercy on your soul.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7鈥?/a>


How about, If elected will Obama get delivered messages from Islamic extremists attacking us. I hate people preaching all of this peace crap while people want to kill them.
Yes, but the ignorant don't want to be challenged, they just want want information to agree with their preconceived notions. Fox, No. 1 overall news network, I can hear people crying already...
That's true. When I see ';Daily Kos'; I immediately dismiss everything else they say.
There are some wacko sources on the internet.
Funny how you put huffpo and moveon up there and fail to mention newsmax, Rush Limbaugh and Fox News.



let's leave them alone, and talk to some people that understand politics and news a little more ja?
That's probably because you hate losing arguments for well known information that they present.
Not as much as those who cite FOX.