Arent all political satements rants?

Is there a opinions section in this site where you can ask for an opinion without someone reporting your question? I'm tired of my questions and answers being reported just because my opinion isnt liked. I'm just asking to get an idea of what other poeple think. Im going to laugh when someone reports this question. I guess I am ranting.Arent all political satements rants?
I am going to report this... seriously.Arent all political satements rants?
It would be nice to get a pole for fun as to who's doing the complaining. By in large, I'd bet its the liberals. Most liberals...but not all.....mess up the works by operating off emotion rather than facts or data. I'm sure we all get insensed over some topic, but its the libs that i've seen that want to too quickly jump on the band wagon, start a grass roots movement and hang the perpetrator from the tallest tree....before they even know enough to judge if the person is actually guilty.


How many times have we heard people decrying ';Bush lied, People died'; slogans..and many others about the current administration, .yet not many that i've talked to actually know what led to the Iraq war and what was actually said by the president or congress. Many can't even seem to recall the 4 years + we were in talks or the many times the weapons inspectors were in Iraq and got kicked out. They conveniently forget that most all of congress voted for the war...The UN supported it, all members signed a resolution as well including France. All was done with good intentions based on the best intelligence we had at the time. Meanwhlie the details seem to get lost....like for instance the head intel guy for Bush was a hold over from the Clinton era.


They like their slogans and believe what they are told by the liberal press. They like their clique blogs and they don't like to be told they got it all wrong or don't have all the information.


Of course, these are generalities i've noticed myself in talking to libs or democrats, it isn't scientific since I can't guarrantee its an acual 'cross-section' of all libs, and it isn't all inclusive, but seems there's alot of statistics that back me up on this opinion. I guess it depends on who you trust for info and how deep you dig for the truth.


IThose few that do claim to dig deep can always be challenged by what side they take or who they vote for. It doesn't make much sense when you have say a candidate surrounded in corruption and scandal and they vote for that person anyways...despite the evidence.
For your own edification and/or amusement review Yahoo!Answers community guidelines. Therein it clearly states that they're not running a debating forum nor providing a soap box for everyone with an axe to grind.





This is Yahoo ANSWERS not Yahoo DEBATES so if you can't stand the heat, get outta the kitchen.